Inconsistencies between Landlock and non-landlock mode #19

Open
opened 2021-10-26 22:28:47 +02:00 by crtxcr · 0 comments
Owner

Code written under the assumption breaks when compiled on landlock-enabled systems.

qssb_append_path_policy(policy, QSSB_FS_ALLOW_READ | QSSB_FS_ALLOW_WRITE)

generall assumes natural behaviour, such as delete being allowed, or the creation of sockets etc.

On landlock, this behaviour changes.

So, we may need to simply implicitly add the necessary flags.

Code written under the assumption breaks when compiled on landlock-enabled systems. qssb_append_path_policy(policy, QSSB_FS_ALLOW_READ | QSSB_FS_ALLOW_WRITE) generall assumes natural behaviour, such as delete being allowed, or the creation of sockets etc. On landlock, this behaviour changes. So, we may need to simply implicitly add the necessary flags.
crtxcr added the
bug
label 2021-10-26 22:28:47 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: crtxcr/exile.h#19
No description provided.