Missing fork() handling and pitfalls #10

開啟中
crtxcr2021-08-09 20:17:19 +02:00建立 · 0 comment
管理員

We don't do fork()/clone() ourselves, opening the door for many pitfalls, e. g. we inherit open file descriptories which may enable bypassing of the policies we set. Otoh, some open fd's may actually be desired.

We must either offer a safe fork()/clone() or check that the current process is in a reasonable state and/or transform to that state.

We don't do fork()/clone() ourselves, opening the door for many pitfalls, e. g. we inherit open file descriptories which may enable bypassing of the policies we set. Otoh, some open fd's may actually be desired. We must either offer a safe fork()/clone() or check that the current process is in a reasonable state and/or transform to that state.
crtxcr added the
bug
enhancement
label 2021-08-09 20:17:19 +02:00
登入 才能加入這對話。
未選擇里程碑
No Assignees
1 參與者
訊息
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: crtxcr/exile.h#10
No description provided.