Without elaborating here, I hacked looqs because I was not satisfied with the state of desktop search on Linux.
Originally a set of CLI python scripts, it is now written in C++ and offers a GUI made using Qt. While a "web app" would have been an option, I prefer a desktop application for something like looqs. I chose Qt because I am more familiar with it than with any other GUI framework. To my knowledge, potential alternatives like GTK do not include as many "batteries" as Qt anyway, so the job presumably would have been harder there.
The architecture ensures that the parsing of documents and the preview generation is sandboxed by [exile.h](https://github.com/quitesimpleorg/exile.h). looqs uses a multi-process architecture to achieve this.
Qt code is considered trusted in this model. While one may critize this, it was the only practical solution. looqs uses its serialization mechanism and other classes to communicate between the non-sandboxed GUI process and the sandboxed processes.
looqs simply strips the tags and that seems to work fine so far. Naturally, this is not the "proper way", so there is room for improvement maybehere. However, those file formats are not a huge priortiy for me personally. libuchardet does encoding detection and conversion.
Naturally looqs won't be able to index and render previews for everything. Such approach would create a huge bloated binary. In the future, there will be some plugin system of some sorts, either we will load .so objects or use subprocesses.
## Name
looqs looks for files. You as the user can also look inside them. The 'k' was replaced by a 'q'. Originally wanted my projects to have "qs" (for quitesimple) in their name. While abandoned now, this got us to looqs.