crtxcr
/
exile.h
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 14 Pull Requests 1 Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Check arch value 

The filter was missing this check for arch, allowing bypasses
by using different calling conventions of other architectures.

A trivial example is execve() of x86 from and x86_64 process.
This commit is contained in:
Albert S. 2021-08-12 11:57:12 +02:00
parent 5cd45c09b7
commit 66c6d28dcd
1 changed files with 15 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
qssb.h
View File

@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <sys/capability.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
@ -58,17 +59,18 @@
#endif
#endif
//TODO: stolen from kernel samples/seccomp, GPLv2...?
#define ALLOW \
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW)
#define DENY \
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL)
#if defined(__i386__)
#define SECCOMP_AUDIT_ARCH AUDIT_ARCH_I386
#elif defined(__x86_64__)
#define SECCOMP_AUDIT_ARCH AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64
#else
#warning Seccomp support has not been tested for qssb.h for this platform yet
#endif
#define SYSCALL(nr, jt) \
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, (nr), 0, 1), jt
#define LOAD_SYSCALL_NR \
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, \
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr))
#define QSSB_UNSHARE_NETWORK 1<<1
#define QSSB_UNSHARE_USER 1<<2
@ -639,10 +641,13 @@ static int seccomp_enable(int *syscalls, size_t n, unsigned int per_syscall, uns
{
struct sock_filter filter[1024] =
{
LOAD_SYSCALL_NR,
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS,offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch)),
BPF_JUMP (BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, SECCOMP_AUDIT_ARCH, 1, 0),
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS),
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
};
unsigned short int current_filter_index = 1;
unsigned short int current_filter_index = 4;
for(size_t i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
unsigned int sysc = (unsigned int) syscalls[i];